Gulf Power Competition in Africa: What Ghana and the AU Stand to Gain in 2026

Gulf power competition in Africa in 2026 is no longer a background trend. It is shaping parts of the AU’s diplomatic agenda, influencing conflict dynamics in the Horn of Africa, and accelerating Gulf-led economic diplomacy across the continent. The core question for Africa, and for Ghana in particular, is how to turn this rivalry into better deals, stronger institutions, and real development outcomes without importing other people’s conflicts.

Context: what “competition” means in 2026

Reuters reporting around the February 2026 AU Summit frames the Saudi–UAE rivalry as especially visible in the Horn of Africa, with pressure on regional governments to align, and with external financing, security ties, and diplomatic maneuvering interacting with fragile domestic politics. That matters for the AU because it raises the risk that continental priorities are distracted by foreign rivalries, but it also creates leverage: two capital-rich actors seeking influence creates a more competitive “market” for partnerships.

At the same time, Gulf engagement is increasingly institutional and trade-framework driven. The UAE’s Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs) are a key instrument: Nigeria and the UAE signed a CEPA in January 2026, explicitly framed around expanding trade and investment across sectors including renewables, aviation, logistics, agriculture, and digital trade. This “rules pipelines” model is different from older, purely project-based engagement.

What the AU stands to gain in 2026

Greater bargaining power and better terms (if negotiated collectively)

Competition improves Africa’s negotiating position, but only when states avoid undercutting each other. The AU’s gain is the ability to set minimum standards and play a coordinating role on issues like local content, transparency, debt sustainability, and labour protections. When Gulf partners are competing for access and legitimacy, the AU can push for clearer disclosure, stronger procurement rules, and measurable development commitments rather than vague MOUs.

Faster infrastructure and logistics build-out aligned to trade integration

Gulf actors have strong strategic interest in ports, aviation, logistics corridors, and food and energy supply chains. If the AU (and regional blocs) align these investments to AfCFTA priorities, the payoff is not just “new assets” but lower trade costs and more regional value chains. The upside is large because infrastructure is one of the binding constraints to intra-African trade. The risk is that “strategic assets” are built for external supply chains without deep domestic linkages. The AU’s opportunity is to hardwire linkages through policy: industrial zones, SME participation, skills transfer, and maintenance financing.

More diversified financing options and a shift from ad-hoc to structured deals

UAE CEPA expansion is part of a broader diversification strategy and brings predictability for investors and regulators. Reuters has also reported UAE CEPA negotiations with additional African states such as Chad and Rwanda (late 2025 context feeding into 2026 momentum), reinforcing that this is not a one-off approach. For the AU, diversification reduces over-reliance on any single external partner (China, EU, US, multilaterals), while structured agreements can reduce transaction costs and improve bankability.

A chance to build continental guardrails on security-linked engagement

Where the rivalry intersects with security (especially in the Horn), the AU has an incentive to strengthen norms around external military basing, security assistance, and proxy financing. The “gain” is institutional: clearer AU positions reduce the ability of external actors to fragment African diplomacy. Reuters’ account of rivalry-linked pressures in the Horn highlights why guardrails matter.

What Ghana stands to gain in 2026

Ghana’s advantage is structural: relative political stability, a strong reputation for diplomacy, and a private sector that can absorb investment if the terms and governance are right. Ghana is also geographically outside the Horn’s most intense rivalry dynamics, which makes it a lower-risk platform for long-term commercial engagement.

Better leverage in Ghana-UAE economic negotiations

Ghana is actively engaging UAE commercial institutions, with Ghana’s Trade Ministry emphasizing the importance of ongoing negotiations toward a Ghana-UAE CEPA during early February 2026 engagements with the Dubai Chamber. In a competitive Gulf environment, Ghana can negotiate harder on the “quality” of the partnership: export market access, investment protections that still preserve policy space, and sector annexes that force implementation rather than announcements.

Practical upside areas for Ghana under a strong CEPA-type framework include: non-oil trade expansion, logistics/aviation services, renewable and grid-adjacent investments, digital trade enablement, and agro-processing value chains, mirroring the sector scope highlighted in the UAE-Nigeria CEPA coverage.

More Gulf FDI into bankable, FX-earning sectors

Ghana stands to gain most where projects earn foreign exchange or substitute imports. Gulf investors typically prefer scalable sectors with clear cashflows and policy stability. For Ghana, the “investable” list includes: ports and logistics services, industrial parks tied to exports, renewable energy and storage where PPAs are credible, and commercial agriculture plus processing with off-take arrangements. The rivalry dynamic can lower Ghana’s cost of capital by increasing the number of interested financiers, but Ghana must structure projects transparently to avoid hidden liabilities.

Labour mobility that is more structured, better governed, and more protective

Beyond capital, labour mobility is emerging as a concrete Gulf–Africa pillar. Ghana’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has described Qatar’s interest in recruiting Ghanaian professionals across sectors such as health, tourism, IT, transport and logistics under Ghana’s Labour Export Programme. Media reporting also points to implementation architecture, including a Ghana-Qatar Joint Technical Committee planned for February 2026.

If Ghana manages this well, the gains are straightforward: jobs, remittances, skills upgrading, and stronger bilateral ties. The condition is governance: ethical recruitment, enforceable labour protections, transparent fees, dispute resolution, and reintegration pathways so the program doesn’t become politically costly or socially harmful.

Diplomatic upside: Ghana as a “neutral, investable gateway”

When rivalry is most intense in the Horn, Gulf partners still need stable, credible anchors elsewhere in Africa. Ghana can position itself as a West African hub for Gulf capital and corporate expansion into ECOWAS markets. This is not about “choosing sides”; it’s about disciplined multi-alignment: Ghana can engage the UAE on trade and investment architecture while also building labour and skills cooperation with Qatar, and still maintain balanced relations across the Gulf.

How to convert opportunity into outcomes (what Ghana and the AU should do now)

Put minimum standards on the table early

For the AU: publish and enforce baseline partnership standards (transparency, procurement integrity, debt disclosure, local content, skills transfer). For Ghana: bake these standards into CEPA annexes, investment MOUs, and project contracts. Don’t negotiate only tariffs and market access; negotiate implementation and accountability.

Prioritize projects that deliver visible domestic linkages

The most defensible deals are those that create local firms, local jobs, and export capacity. Ghana should prioritize: logistics industrialization bundles (not just ports), agro-processing with farmer integration, renewable energy with local O&M training, and digital infrastructure with SME enablement.

Treat labour mobility as a governance program, not just a headline

Build a clear framework covering recruitment standards, worker welfare monitoring, contract transparency, and a complaints system. The existence of a Joint Technical Committee is a starting point; the credibility comes from measurable safeguards and public reporting.

Avoid proxy entanglement and reputational risk

The rivalry can pull states into “alignment games.” The AU should keep conflict mediation and peace priorities insulated from external competition, and Ghana should keep its partnerships primarily commercial and development-focused, with strict transparency so deals don’t become politicized domestically.

How does this rivalry enhance the economic performance of the Gulf states?

The rivalry between Gulf states especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) over influence in Africa in 2026 isn’t just a diplomatic contest. It has concrete economic logic for the Gulf partners themselves. Competition in Africa can enhance their own economic performance in several measurable ways:

Diversification away from oil-centric economies

For Saudi Arabia and the UAE, long-term economic stability depends on reducing dependence on hydrocarbons. Engagement in Africa offers access to agriculture, manufacturing, logistics, financial services, renewable energy, and digital sectors. Through structured agreements and equity investments, Gulf firms gain exposure to growing African markets while exporting services such as engineering, project management, aviation, and financial intermediation. This broadens the composition of GDP in Gulf economies and strengthens non-oil trade balances. Competition accelerates diversification because each state seeks to secure market share quickly, reinforcing domestic reform agendas such as Saudi Vision 2030 and the UAE’s post-oil growth strategy.

Expansion of export markets and trade corridors

Through trade agreements and commercial diplomacy, Gulf states gain preferential access to African economies. This facilitates exports of petrochemical products, construction services, aviation services, renewable technologies, and financial solutions. Structured frameworks like CEPAs lower tariffs and reduce regulatory uncertainty, allowing firms to scale operations. Expanding export destinations improves trade balances and strengthens non-oil GDP. As firms integrate into African supply chains, they also capture re-export advantages through Gulf logistics hubs, reinforcing the Gulf’s role as a global trade intermediary.

Portfolio Diversification for Sovereign Wealth Funds

Sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf seek geographic and sectoral diversification to manage risk. Africa offers high-growth exposure distinct from traditional North American and European holdings. By investing in consumer goods, real estate, logistics, and agribusiness across African markets, Gulf funds reduce correlation risk with oil revenues and Western market cycles. Diversified portfolios stabilize long-term returns, enhance resilience against commodity shocks, and improve intergenerational wealth preservation strategies central to Gulf fiscal sustainability frameworks.

Reinforcing Global Economic Influence

Demonstrated capacity to execute complex investments in diverse African markets strengthens Gulf reputational capital. This credibility attracts further foreign direct investment into Gulf economies, as international investors perceive strategic depth and operational competence. Expanded global networks improve diplomatic leverage in multilateral forums and economic negotiations. Over time, outward investment success feeds inward capital flows, reinforcing financial sector growth and solidifying the Gulf’s position as a leading emerging global investment hub.

Bottom line

In 2026, Gulf competition can either fragment African diplomacy or strengthen African bargaining power. The AU stands to gain most by coordinating standards and preventing a race to the bottom. Ghana stands to gain by positioning as a stable gateway for Gulf trade and investment frameworks (not just projects), while using labour mobility and skills cooperation as a governed, accountable pathway to jobs and remittances. The decisive factor is not how much money is promised; it is the quality of the rules, the implementation discipline, and whether Africans capture durable value from the relationships.

The post Gulf Power Competition in Africa: What Ghana and the AU Stand to Gain in 2026 appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story