Beyond the numbers: Using analytics to drive strategic choice using the insights to action framework

By Benedict ASHIEDU

Most organizations today are awash in data. Dashboards update in real time. Analysts generate increasingly sophisticated models. Yet strategic decisions are still often shaped by instinct, precedent, or the loudest voice in the room. The issue is rarely access to information. It is the absence of a disciplined way to convert insight into action.

In many companies, analytics remains a retrospective tool. It explains what happened, validates decisions already taken, or justifies outcomes after the fact. In high-performing organizations, analytics plays a different role. It informs judgment before choices are locked in, and it changes how leaders allocate attention, capital, and risk. The difference is not technical. It is organizational.

When Analytics Becomes a Strategic Capability

Analytics becomes valuable when it is used repeatedly under real decision pressure. One-off initiatives and isolated centers of excellence do not build this capability. Habits do. Consider a global consumer goods company operating across both mature and emerging markets. Leadership had access to years of detailed data on sales, pricing, promotions, and inventory. Still, new product launches routinely disappointed. Explanations focused on macroeconomic volatility and competitive intensity.

Deeper analysis told a less comfortable story. Demand was not the problem. Products were missing from shelves in precisely the locations where demand was strongest. Distribution gaps, weak retailer execution, and logistics failures explained most of the underperformance.

The analytical insight was not the breakthrough. The response was. Leadership shifted its focus away from national marketing campaigns toward regional distribution partnerships and in-store execution. Capital was reallocated rather than increased. Within two quarters, availability improved and market share recovered. What changed was not the data. It was how leaders used it, and how willing they were to act on what it revealed.

From information to strategic choice – The insights to action framework

The Insight-to-Action Framework explains how analytics creates value only when it is embedded within decision-making processes, governance structures, and execution pathways. Analytics only creates value when it travels from observation to decision to execution. That progression is rarely automatic. The framework consists of four tightly linked stages.

Stage 1 – Insight: Identifying meaningful signals

First, organizations must capture signals that reflect real behavior. Useful data often lives in operational systems, customer interactions, or informal workflows rather than in polished reports. A growth-stage fintech facing rising churn did not wait for pristine historical datasets. It examined onboarding behavior, session drop-offs, and early feature usage. The signals were imperfect but sufficient.

Stage 2 – Interpretation: Translating data into strategic meaning

Second, data must be interpreted through a strategic lens. The fintech learned that churn was driven less by pricing or marketing quality and more by friction in the first two user interactions. This reframing shifted responsibility from marketing to product design.

Stage 3 – Decision: Committing to a course of action

Third comes judgment. Analytics can illuminate options, but leaders must decide what trade-offs to make. In this case, resources were moved away from acquisition toward onboarding redesign. That choice involved risk and internal resistance, not just analysis.

Stage 4 – Action: Embedding analytics into execution

Finally, decisions must be embedded into execution. Teams were reorganized around retention metrics, sprint priorities were rewritten, and incentives were aligned with long-term customer value. Only then did the insight translate into measurable results.

Why analytics often fails

Across sectors, analytics initiatives fail for predictable reasons. Insights are produced but not owned by decision-makers. Findings challenge entrenched narratives and are quietly sidelined. Execution systems remain unchanged. A public-sector health agency offers a clear example. Analysis showed that preventive care delivered through rural clinics produced higher marginal health outcomes than hospital-based treatment. Yet funding continued to favor large, visible infrastructure projects. The data was sound, but it did not align with political incentives or budget cycles.

Only when analysts reframed the findings in fiscal and legislative terms did spending patterns shift. Procurement rules and funding mechanisms were redesigned. The constraint had never been analytical sophistication. It was translation into decision logic that mattered to those in power.

What high-performing organizations do differently

Organizations that consistently convert analytics into advantage share a few common traits. Senior leaders engage directly with analytics rather than delegating interpretation. Major analytical efforts are explicitly tied to concrete decisions and trade-offs. Incentives, governance, and operating rhythms are adjusted to reflect what the data reveals. In these environments, analytics is not a reporting layer. It is part of how the organization thinks.

Conclusion – From knowing to choosing

The true value of analytics lies not in prediction, but in direction. Data can inform, but leadership must choose. Organizations that treat analytics as a strategic capability build the ability to learn faster, adapt earlier, and allocate resources more deliberately under uncertainty. In an era defined by volatility and information overload, advantage will belong to those who do not merely analyze better, but decide better, sooner, and with conviction.

>>>the writer is a management consultant specializing in private equity and strategic advisory. A Duke MBA and Fellow of the Institute of Management Consultants (FIMC), he has worked across multiple African markets, shaping cross-border investments and advising on high-impact deals that advance the continent’s economic growth. Deeply passionate about Africa’s development, Benedict blends global business insight with local expertise to drive transformative outcomes. He can be reached at [email protected]

The post Beyond the numbers: Using analytics to drive strategic choice using the insights to action framework appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story